What did Jim Bianco (@biancoresearch) post on X, week of Sep 15 – Sep 21, 2026?

The week turned on the Fed's unanimous 25 bp hike to 3.75-4%, a move @biancoresearch had been anticipating as the end of a two-year policy error. He spent the week dissecting the vote, the structural inflation justification, and the escalating political pressure from Trump on Chair Warsh, while noting that markets are now pricing in another move before the midterms.

Weekly brief · week of Sep 15 – Sep 21, 2026

Get this account in TelegramFollow

Macro & Fed Policy

~72%

Macro and Fed policy dominated the week, anchored by the Fed's unanimous 25 bp hike to a 3.75%-4% range and the political fallout. He argued the hike ended a two-year policy mistake, not created a new one. [1]

The two-year policy error & the hike: He argued the Fed's rate cuts starting Sept. 18, 2024 were a two-year policy error that finally ended with this hike [2]. The 10-year yield is up 1.30% since the cutting cycle began, the only time in 50+ years that long-term yields rose during a prolonged cutting cycle [2]. His most-replied post in this thread (27 replies) argued the Fed did not make a mistake by hiking but ended a two-year mistake, with the market having rejected easy policy through higher yields [3]. He pushed back against the idea that the hike was a mistake, saying the market told the Fed for two years they had the wrong policy [4], [5].

The 12-0 vote & Fed independence: He predicted a split vote would protect Fed independence, but the 12-0 unanimous hike showed half the voters didn't follow through on public statements [6], [1]. His most-discussed post here (30 replies) highlighted global yields at multi-decade highs, with the US 10Y above 5% for the first time since 2007 [7]. The unanimous vote means Trump only needs to pressure one person—Warsh—to get the policy he wants [8]. He noted Warsh didn't submit a dot plot for the second time, seeing it as a refusal to commit to forward guidance [9]. When Trump said he told Warsh to "vote with the board because it's not going to matter," @biancoresearch flagged it as Trump telling Warsh how to vote and defended the Fed's independence from the President [10], [11].

Structural inflation & the 'print oil' rebuttal: He rejected the "Fed can't print oil" narrative as lazy, arguing core PCE has been above 2% for 65 months [12], [13]. Deglobalization ended goods deflation (core goods inflation went from -0.50% for 18 years post-China WTO entry to +1.82% post-COVID), while services inflation has averaged nearly 4% [13]. A 3.5-3.75% funds rate is stimulative given this structural inflation [13]. He also noted the CPI/PCE gap is the largest since 1985 due to housing weightings, and that core PCE at 3.3% and rising supports the hike [14].

October hike & forward guidance: He dismissed the narrative that the Fed can't hike on October 28 because it's the week before the midterms, noting the market prices a 60% chance of a hike and rising [15]. If the Fed defies the market by not hiking, he warned the market could reject it again by pushing yields higher [15]. He also resurfaced his own early-September argument that dismantling forward guidance is healthy and forces leveraged traders back to risk management [16].

other

~18%

He mocked Liz Truss for seemingly arguing the UK is having a worse "Liz Truss moment" with gilts near 6% and saying it's not her fault [17]. He used France's credit downgrade to AA+ to explain that government yields are set by inflation expectations, growth, and deficits—not credit ratings—pointing out France has had lower yields than the US for 13+ years despite being a lower-rated credit [18]. He posted a photo of two bearish magazine covers out on the same day, asking if it's time to "back up the truck and buy" [19]. He retweeted @TrungTPhan's joke about a terrifying new Spirit Halloween costume [20].

Geopolitics & Energy Markets (~5%): He gave JP Morgan credit for admitting it no longer has a baseline view on oil, writing "we simply don't know how to model the endgame," rather than making things up [21]. He retweeted @HFI_Research sharing the JPM oil report everyone was talking about, keeping the focus on the intersection of the Iran war, disrupted supply chains, and market modeling [22].

Market Structure & AI Bifurcation (~5%): He noted the Atlanta Fed's GDPNow tracker hit 5.1% for Q3 2026 on strong retail sales, restating that the economy is booming [23]. On the AI side, he joked about Anthropic quietly building a "wet lab" in the San Francisco Bay Area for AI drug programs, saying it explains why they worry AI will end humanity—because they are the ones who will end it [24].

30 replies · 10.8k viewsHe listed global yields at multi-decade highs (US 10Y >5%, highest since 2007) and asked if anyone else sees a theme, drawing 30 replies on the secular trend. [7]

27 replies · 16.2k viewsHe argued the Fed did not make a policy error by hiking but ended a two-year policy mistake, pushing back on critics who questioned who decides whether it was a mistake, in a thread that drew 27 replies. [3]

25 replies · 14.2k viewsHe made a six-part case that deglobalization ended goods deflation and masked services inflation, making the hike appropriate and drawing 25 replies debating the structural inflation thesis. [13]

647.1k viewsretweeted @TommyThornton's post saying Trump claimed Warsh called and wants to make a deal, highlighting the political pressure on the Fed Chair. [25]

99.1k viewsretweeted @TrungTPhan's joke that Spirit Halloween dropped a terrifying new costume. [20]

91.2k viewsretweeted @HFI_Research sharing the JPM oil report everyone's talking about, surfacing the bank's admission that it can no longer model the oil endgame. [22]

34.5k viewsretweeted @NickTimiraos noting that 16 of 18 participants have at least one more increase penciled in for 2026, with few seeing rates ending below 4%. [26]

  • ▲ LONGUS Treasury YieldsIf the Fed defies the market by not hiking on October 28, the market will reject the hold by pushing long-term yields higher. [15]
Get this account in Telegram, free.Mirra posts every new brief to a private channel. Joining a channel that already exists costs nothing.Free to join · no X or Telegram credentialsFollow this account

How Mirra writes a brief

Three steps, the same way every time — so a brief can be checked rather than trusted.

1
Every public postThreads, replies and quotes the account published inside the cycle window. Retweets are read for context, never counted as authorship.
2
Grouped by topicMirra weighs how much of the window went where, then writes one summary per topic — the dominant topic gets subgroups.
3
Nothing unlinkedEvery claim and stated position points back to the post it came from, so you can check it in one click.

Questions

A summary of everything one X account posted inside a cycle — grouped by topic, with a citation on every claim back to the post it came from. Mirra writes it; the account does not.

Once per cycle. A weekly brief is published at the end of its seven-day window, and this page then shows the newest one.

Yes. Add any public X account and Mirra starts covering it — you get briefs in the dashboard, a private Telegram channel or by email, on the schedule you pick.

Mirra emblem

Follow the accounts that matter. Skip the feed.

The algorithm hides posts. You both lose. Mirra reads every public post, groups what was said, and delivers it on your schedule.

Start free trialBrowse public briefs

This is an automatically generated summary of @biancoresearch's public posts on X — the linked originals are the source of record. Mirra is not affiliated with Jim Bianco.

Are you @biancoresearch and want this page removed? Email support@mirra.to.